New York Attorney General Letitia James filed an emergency motion Tuesday to block President Trump’s new executive order on elections. A coalition of AG’s argues the order unlawfully overrides state control of elections. They also say it imposes burdensome new voter registration rules, and threatens voter access ahead of the 2025 elections.
Executive order imposes new barriers to voting
Attorney General James emphasized that the Constitution grants authority over elections to the states and Congress—not the president. Trump’s order, issued April 3, imposes sweeping new restrictions, including:
- Requiring physical proof of citizenship for federal voter registration.
- Mandating public assistance agencies assess citizenship status before providing registration forms.
- Banning the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day.
- Threatening to withhold federal election funding for states that fail to comply.
“These illegal mandates would throw our elections into chaos, disenfranchise voters, and undermine trust in democracy,” James said.
States warn of chaos, disenfranchisement
The coalition’s motion argues that the order would force states to overhaul voter registration systems at massive taxpayer expense. The rushed timeline is already forcing state and local election officials to abandon critical projects and divert resources toward compliance efforts.
Without intervention, election officials could face impossible choices between following state laws or risking federal prosecution. New York, for example, has received over $237 million in federal election funds—critical support that could be stripped away under Trump’s mandates.
Voters face new risks under the executive order
Beyond administrative chaos, the attorneys general warn that the new citizenship proof requirement could disenfranchise eligible voters, particularly low-income individuals and those without immediate access to citizenship documents.
The order could also lead to mass rejection of valid mail-in ballots. In 2024, more than 836,000 New Yorkers voted by mail, and over 23,500 ballots were “cured” to fix minor errors. The new restrictions could block these ballots, eroding public confidence and potentially destabilizing election results.
“The rushed deadlines and shifting rules invite confusion, errors, and challenges to legitimate election outcomes,” the coalition stated in their filing.
National coalition joins legal battle
Attorneys general from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin joined James in the motion.
Together, they argue that immediate court action is necessary to prevent irreparable harm before the federal voter registration form is changed and new deadlines take effect.
What happens next
The coalition’s lawsuit could have sweeping implications for how elections are administered nationwide in 2025 and beyond. A court decision on the preliminary injunction is expected soon.
Meanwhile, election officials continue to prepare under mounting uncertainty—balancing new federal mandates with the need to uphold state laws and ensure every eligible voter’s ballot is counted.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to [email protected].