Geneva City Council is weighing millions in infrastructure investments for 2026 — and how much future residents should be asked to pay for them.
A new budget discussion document outlines the city’s financial crossroads: Whether to take on more debt for needed upgrades or slow down to live within its means.
Debt is rising and so are concerns
About 18% of every dollar the city spends currently goes toward debt payments. For 2026, officials are proposing more than $16 million in new capital spending, including street reconstruction, water and sewer upgrades, and equipment purchases — much of it to be funded through bonds.
Councilor Patrick Grimaldi argues the city’s shrinking population and rising poverty rates make it risky to continue borrowing at current levels. “Let’s help people afford to live in this city and only spend what we have,” he wrote.
Big projects, big costs
Among the proposals:
- Pulteney Street reconstruction: $3 million from the general fund, with additional borrowing for water and sewer work. Total cost to taxpayers and users over time: nearly $12 million.
- Clinton, Cherry, and Elmwood Streets: Over $5.5 million in combined water, sewer, and road work costs spread across 15 to 30 years.
- Cellular water meters: Estimated cost of $652,000, designed to improve billing accuracy and reduce revenue loss from failing meters.
Grimaldi and city staff both acknowledge delaying work could worsen infrastructure conditions and drive up future costs due to inflation and emergency repairs.
Fire and EMS services under review
The Geneva Fire Department responded to 343 EMS calls in 2024, often arriving well before private ambulances. While Finger Lakes Ambulance is the designated provider, it has no formal contract with the city and can’t guarantee coverage.
The city may explore creating its own municipal EMS program or pushing for a satellite ambulance base locally. For now, GFD’s role in EMS remains essential, with no current costs for medical supplies and training covered by the city.
Staffing tradeoffs stir debate
Geneva’s police department is operating with two fewer officers than in recent years. Grimaldi suggests shifting funds from a community coordinator role in the planning department to restore at least one officer position in 2026.
But city staff warn such a move could undercut economic development, community engagement, and grant funding capacity. Recreation and development staff also manage key programs, events, and grant applications that bring in outside money.
Infrastructure vs. affordability
Grimaldi’s central argument is rooted in affordability. While many in Geneva have modest incomes, city services are increasingly being used by non-residents, he says. “The people who make bigger money are moving out to the towns where costs are lower,” Grimaldi wrote.
He supports continuing street resurfacing using state CHIPS funds and calls for saving cash for rink upgrades, rather than borrowing for a project used by a relatively small number of residents.
What’s next
Council will continue discussing the proposed projects, funding strategies, and long-term impacts in the coming weeks. Some items may be delayed, restructured, or funded differently based on community feedback and council consensus.
For now, it’s clear that Geneva’s leaders are navigating the same tough questions facing many small cities: how to maintain aging infrastructure, provide essential services, and stay affordable for residents — all at the same time.

