Attorney General Letitia James will take over the criminal investigation into a former Cornell University student's allegation that seven fraternity members sexually assaulted her in October 2024. Gov. Kathy Hochul appointed James's office as special prosecutor Thursday, removing the reopened case from Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten after saying she had lost confidence in his ability to handle it.
In her statement announcing the executive order, Hochul pointed to newly released information that raises questions about both the Cornell University Police Department's investigation and Van Houten's decision not to prosecute in 2024. James's office will investigate and, if warranted, bring charges and present evidence to a grand jury. The appointment is not a finding that a crime occurred, and no criminal charges have been announced.
James said in a separate statement that the investigation would be guided by the facts and the law. Neither office announced a timetable for the review or a grand jury presentation. The governor and attorney general are expected to provide an update Friday morning, according to The Associated Press.
What the civil lawsuit says
The case widely known as the “Cornell Seven” centers on a 101-page lawsuit filed Sept. 14 by a former student identified as Jane Doe. As FingerLakes1 reported when the complaint became public, she alleges she was plied with alcohol and drugs, including ketamine, and sexually assaulted by multiple men at Cornell's Chi Phi fraternity house in Ithaca on Oct. 19 and 20, 2024, while she was unable to consent. The complaint includes an image it says shows a fraternity group message inviting others to the room.
Doe is suing seven men who were Cornell students at the time, the university, fraternity and sorority organizations, and an Ithaca bar. She seeks damages and a jury trial. Those are allegations in a pending civil case, not findings of criminal guilt or liability. Lawyers for at least two of the men have denied their clients participated in a sexual assault. One defendant, Canandaigua resident Scott Norris, said through his attorney that he briefly entered the room and took part in a group chat but did not engage in sexual activity or drug use.
Why the prosecutor's original decision is under scrutiny
Doe reported the incident to Cornell police in November 2024. In a Sept. 28 statement, Van Houten said his office reviewed a six-page statement she signed and determined that the conduct described in it did not support sex-crime charges under New York law. He said that account differed materially from the later lawsuit. Doe's attorney has disputed his characterization. The full signed statement has not been publicly released, limiting an independent comparison of the accounts.
Van Houten reopened the investigation after the lawsuit drew renewed attention and assigned a senior prosecutor to prepare a possible grand jury presentation, as FingerLakes1 previously detailed. Hochul's order now shifts that criminal responsibility to James's office. A grand jury could consider evidence and vote on charges, but neither the reopened investigation nor the appointment guarantees an indictment.
New questions have emerged about what investigators told prosecutors in 2024. CBS News New York reported that a transcript of Doe's November police interview records her saying she was certain she had been raped, while also describing drinking, drug use, gaps in memory and an initial encounter she described differently from later events. Van Houten told CBS he had not seen that transcript before his original decision and would seek it. CBS said it had not seen her final signed statement. The transcript and signed statement are different records; the available reporting does not establish exactly which interview material prosecutors had.
Cornell's own description of the evidence it shared has changed. The Cornell Daily Sun found that a university FAQ initially said campus police provided “all investigatory information” to the district attorney, then removed that language and later specified that Doe's sworn statement and a Snapchat screenshot were provided. The Sun also reported that Van Houten told ABC News he had not received the screenshot. The conflicting accounts do not, by themselves, resolve what the office received or why it declined charges. They are among the questions the new investigation can examine.
The debate over New York's consent law
The allegations have also renewed a separate debate about New York's sexual-offense laws. The state's definition of “mentally incapacitated” addresses intoxication caused without a person's consent, leaving a narrower route to prosecute some cases involving voluntary drinking or drug use. Spectrum News 1 reported that former judge and Rochester attorney John DeMarco sees the question of what an accused person knew about a complainant's capacity, and what prosecutors can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, as central to such cases. His comments were legal analysis, not a finding about what happened at Cornell or the reason Van Houten declined charges.
State Sen. Nathalia Fernandez and Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz back legislation that would address circumstances in which a person was so intoxicated they could not appraise or control their conduct and the accused knew or reasonably should have known it. The bill passed the Senate in June but remains in an Assembly committee; it is not current law. Whether and how the law as it stood in October 2024 applies to these allegations is for the new prosecutors to assess. Voluntary intoxication alone does not establish either consent or a crime.
Cornell's response and the other reviews
Cornell has said its campus police investigated the report and referred material to prosecutors. A separate university disciplinary process included a hearing and resulted in sanctions that included suspensions and expulsions; the Chi Phi chapter was closed in 2024 and remains barred from campus. The university has rejected the claim that writing essays was the sole consequence for any student involved. Those campus findings and sanctions are separate from both criminal charges and Doe's civil lawsuit.
The Ithaca Police Department said it was not notified of the 2024 allegations and learned of them through news coverage. Ithaca Mayor Robert Cantelmo subsequently announced a moratorium on certain city student-event permits while seeking answers about Cornell's safety protocols and coordination with city police, as FingerLakes1 reported. The absence of a city-police report should not be confused with an absence of review by Cornell police or county prosecutors.
Court documents unsealed this week offer a fuller view of the university process. CNY Central reported that Cornell's investigator conducted more than 50 interviews involving 32 witnesses; the disciplinary hearings spanned 12 days, produced more than 1,700 pages of transcripts and led to a 99-page panel decision. In testimony described in those records, Doe said the ketamine left her disoriented and that she felt “like bait” as men entered the room. Those are her account and the university's disciplinary record, not criminal-court findings.
The same report describes one respondent whom the panel found responsible for attempted sexual exploitation and ordered to avoid contact with Doe, write a reflection paper and help develop educational programming. That finding and sanction concern that respondent; they do not describe the outcome for every accused man or negate Cornell's statement that the broader range of sanctions included suspensions and expulsions. The Washington Post reported that at least one sanctioned former student is appealing a court decision rejecting his challenge to a disciplinary finding. An attorney for one of the men told the Post that the evidence should be tested through a fair legal process.
Separately, Hochul called for an outside examination of Cornell's handling of the allegations. Cornell agreed to an independent review, as FingerLakes1 reported Wednesday. Its scope, reviewer and timetable have not been publicly announced. That institutional review is distinct from James's criminal investigation and the pending civil case. A Cornell spokesperson told the Post on Thursday that the university supports Hochul's decision to assign the criminal case to the attorney general.
The allegations have also prompted a broader campus and government response. Cornell's Student Assembly held a public hearing Thursday at which students pressed for transparency and stronger support for people reporting sexual violence, CBS News New York reported. Spectrum News 1 spoke with students who questioned Cornell's policies and disciplinary response while also expressing concern that online anger was being directed at students generally. Those reactions do not establish the facts of the alleged assault or the adequacy of any particular sanction.
The Ithaca Voice reported that some students said the allegations had shaken their sense of safety, while others called for more bystander-intervention and campus-police training. It also reported that Cornell's task force recommended additional consent, Title IX and reporting training and a more detailed rating system for Greek organizations. The university has not publicly confirmed the enrollment or graduation status of the men named in the lawsuit, the Voice noted. FingerLakes1 has reported that Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is urging Congress to take up campus safety legislation; that proposal has not become law and would not determine the outcome of this case.
For now, the central decisions remain ahead: what evidence James's office obtains, whether it asks a grand jury to consider charges, how the civil defendants respond in court and what Cornell's independent review finds. None of those proceedings has yet established what happened inside the Chi Phi house that night.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to news@fingerlakes1.com.