Skip to content
Home » News » Elections » NY’s 130th Assembly District: Diverging views on the future of Finger Lakes

NY’s 130th Assembly District: Diverging views on the future of Finger Lakes

NY’s 130th Assembly District: Diverging views on the future of Finger Lakes

The race for New York’s 130th Assembly District is heating up as incumbent Republican Brian Manktelow faces Democratic challenger James Schuler. The district, which spans parts of Wayne, Cayuga, and Oswego counties, is seeing a clash of visions as both candidates focus on economic growth, community engagement, and government accountability.


Manktelow’s Track Record and Legislative Focus

Brian Manktelow, who has represented the 130th Assembly District since 2019, is running for re-election on a platform emphasizing conservative principles and local advocacy. Manktelow serves on several key committees, including Energy, Environmental Conservation, Local Governments, Veterans’ Affairs, and Ways and Means, which have shaped his legislative focus.

As a veteran and ranking minority member of the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Manktelow has been vocal in his support for veterans, advocating for the timely distribution of funds and services to those who served. He has also pushed for increased transparency in New York’s COVID-19 response, demanding an independent review of state actions during the pandemic.

On economic issues, Manktelow frequently emphasizes the high cost of living in New York. He has criticized state policies he claims drive residents and businesses out of the state, while advocating for affordable childcare solutions and opposing mandates he sees as burdensome, such as the transition to electric school buses by 2027.

Schuler’s Platform for Change

James Schuler, a newcomer to state politics, presents himself as a candidate focused on unifying and revitalizing the community. He emphasizes the need for inclusive and proactive governance, promising to uplift every sector of the district, with a special focus on empowering young adults aged 18 to 35. Schuler envisions policies that provide educational and economic opportunities, such as expanding summer job programs and supporting small businesses.

A key component of Schuler’s platform is criminal justice reform, aimed at addressing drug issues and supporting mental health initiatives. He proposes community-based justice reforms that foster collaboration between law enforcement, non-profits, and probation departments to aid in reintegration and support for at-risk individuals.


Schuler also places strong emphasis on local economic development, particularly the revitalization of small towns along Ridge Road. He aims to address the economic challenges these areas face, especially those impacted by traffic diversions following the construction of State Route 104.

Economic and Community Issues Take Center Stage

Both candidates emphasize economic development, though their approaches differ significantly. Manktelow, who has been critical of state government mandates and regulations, argues for reducing taxes and loosening regulations to foster business growth. He highlights his track record of advocating for small businesses and opposing programs like the school electric vehicle mandate, which he believes burdens school districts financially.

Schuler, meanwhile, focuses on community-centric economic growth. He supports policies that attract larger businesses to the district while also nurturing small business growth through consumer-friendly initiatives. He aims to transform the district into a “destination” area by leveraging local land and lake resources to boost tourism and economic activity.

Diverging Views on Justice Reform and Healthcare

Schuler’s platform on justice reform seeks to provide a balanced approach, advocating for bail reform tailored to the unique needs of small-town residents. He emphasizes a collaborative approach to criminal justice, working with community organizations to reduce recidivism and ensure public safety.

Manktelow, however, has been more focused on advocating for transparency in state governance and addressing statewide issues like the cost of healthcare and prescription drugs. He criticizes what he sees as a lack of accountability from Albany and has called for independent reviews and reforms to ensure state funds are used efficiently.