Skip to content
DiSanto Propane (Banner)
Home » News » Video of Canandaigua police encounter sparks backlash

Video of Canandaigua police encounter sparks backlash

A YouTube video analyzing a City of Canandaigua police encounter involving an autistic father and his young son has prompted widespread criticism of the police department and intensified online debate over civil rights, police conduct and government use of social media.

The video, published by a civil rights attorney and commentator, centers on body-worn camera footage from a Nov. 15, 2025 encounter in which a Canandaigua police officer stops a man who was playing Pokémon Go with his 10-year-old son on a city sidewalk. The officer questions the father about a wet spot on his pants, repeatedly asks whether he has been drinking or using drugs, checks his identification, searches his bag and later speaks directly with the child before ending the encounter without making an arrest.

In the footage, the father explains that the wet spot resulted from an accidental urine leak and states multiple times that he does not drink or use drugs. The officer expresses skepticism, telling the man the pants appear “way too wet for just a little dribble,” and suggests that a “grown man with wet pants” must be “on something.” The officer also asks personal questions unrelated to any alleged crime, including whether the man lives alone and whether he is still with the child’s mother.

At one point, the officer instructs the father to walk over to the patrol car, retains his identification and runs a warrant check. The officer then searches the man’s backpack, examining items including electronics, hygiene supplies and personal effects. Afterward, the officer tells the father, “I’m going to talk to your son and then I’ll let you go,” before questioning the child briefly and ending the stop.


The video’s author argues that the interaction amounted to an unlawful detention without reasonable suspicion and included a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The commentator also asserts that the officer failed to recognize or appropriately accommodate the man’s autism, instead interpreting his movements and communication style as signs of intoxication or impairment.

The father later posted his own account on social media, describing the stop as humiliating and saying his son appeared frightened during the encounter. He said he complied with the officer’s requests because he was concerned about his child’s emotional well-being, not because he believed he was legally required to do so.

After the video circulated widely, criticism spread across Facebook pages and local community groups, including comments left on city and police department posts. Several commenters accused the department of harassment, misconduct and targeting a disabled individual. Others called for the officer involved to be fired, decertified or retrained, while some warned the city could face civil lawsuits.

Multiple commenters also focused on the department’s decision to limit or disable public comments on official social media posts, describing the move as an attempt to silence criticism. Some cited recent U.S. Supreme Court guidance on when an official’s social media activity constitutes state action, arguing that deleting or hiding critical comments on government pages could violate the First Amendment.

Sarcastic remarks, memes and repeated links to the video appeared across posts, with some users mocking the officer’s emphasis on the wet clothing and others framing the encounter as emblematic of broader concerns about police treatment of neurodivergent individuals. Several commenters explicitly referenced autism and mental health training, arguing that the incident demonstrated a need for stronger standards and accountability.

As of publication, the City of Canandaigua and its police department have not issued a detailed public response addressing the specific allegations raised in the video. No charges were filed as a result of the encounter, and no disciplinary action has been publicly announced.

The video continues to circulate on YouTube and Facebook, where it has drawn significant attention and remains a focal point of online discussion about policing, disability awareness and constitutional rights.