New York’s Medical Aid in Dying Act lays out a detailed, step-by-step process for terminally ill patients and the physicians who care for them, with the goal of ensuring decisions are informed, voluntary, and carefully documented.
Under the legislation, only adults with a terminal illness expected to lead to death within six months may qualify. Patients must have decision-making capacity and make the request themselves — no family member, health care proxy, or advance directive can do it for them.
What patients must do
Patients must first make both an oral request and a written request to their attending physician. The written request must be signed and dated in front of two adult witnesses who attest that the patient is acting voluntarily and without coercion. Witnesses cannot be relatives, beneficiaries, health care workers at the treating facility, or anyone with a financial interest in the patient’s estate.
Patients must demonstrate that they understand their diagnosis, prognosis, the risks and expected effects of the medication, and all reasonable alternatives, including palliative care and hospice. They must also acknowledge that taking the medication is optional and that they can choose not to take it even after receiving it.
At any point, patients may rescind their request, in any manner, and for any reason. They are not required to inform family members of their decision, though doctors are required to discuss the importance of doing so.
If medication is prescribed, the patient must self-administer it. No physician, nurse, or other person may administer the medication, and it cannot be taken in a public place. After death, any unused medication must be safely returned or disposed of according to state or federal guidelines.
What doctors must do
The attending physician carries primary responsibility for overseeing the process. That doctor must examine the patient and medical records and determine that the patient has a terminal illness, decision-making capacity, and is acting voluntarily after making an informed decision.
The attending physician must also explain all end-of-life options, including pain management, hospice, and palliative care, and provide state-approved educational materials. The doctor must ensure the patient understands the risks, the expected outcome, and the option to decline or rescind the request at any time.
A second, independent consulting physician must examine the patient and confirm the diagnosis, prognosis, decision-making capacity, and voluntariness in writing. If either physician believes the patient may lack capacity due to depression, a psychiatric condition, or impaired judgment, the patient must be referred to a mental health professional. If that professional finds the patient lacks capacity, the process stops.
Before writing a prescription, the attending physician must offer the patient another opportunity to rescind the request and must document every step of the process in the medical record, including all requests, confirmations, evaluations, and the medication prescribed.
Physicians may prescribe or order the medication themselves or refer the patient to another physician to do so. They may facilitate filling and delivering the prescription, but they may not administer the medication.
Voluntary participation and legal protections
No physician, pharmacist, nurse, or facility is required to participate. Health care providers who decline must transfer records if the patient seeks care elsewhere. Facilities with religious or moral objections may prohibit the practice but must inform patients and, if requested, arrange for transfer to a willing facility.
The law provides legal protections for health care providers acting in good faith and clarifies that medical aid in dying is not considered suicide or homicide. The cause of death listed on the death certificate would be the underlying terminal illness, not the ingestion of medication.
Supporters say the framework is designed to balance patient autonomy with safeguards against coercion or misuse. Critics raised ethical concerns, but the bill’s language emphasizes repeated consent, multiple medical reviews, and strict documentation as central safeguards in the process.


