In a pivotal decision, the Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, has overturned a ruling that invalidated a Seneca Falls law aimed at closing the Seneca Meadows Landfill by 2025, declaring that the company behind the landfill did not have the legal standing to challenge the town’s environmental review process.
The case centered on Seneca Meadows, Inc., which sought to annul the Town of Seneca Falls’ Local Law No. 3 of 2016. The law effectively mandates the closure of the landfill by December 31, 2025, by prohibiting waste management facilities from operating beyond that date. SMI had argued that the town’s environmental review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act was inadequate.
In the original June 2023 decision by the Supreme Court of Seneca County, the court ruled in favor of SMI, concluding that the town did not comply with SEQRA requirements and that SMI had standing based on the potential economic impact of the law. However, the appellate court disagreed, finding that SMI’s claims of economic harm did not fall within SEQRA’s “zone of interest,” which is meant to protect environmental rather than economic concerns.
“The purposes of SEQRA are to prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and enhance community resources,” the court’s memorandum stated. It emphasized that entities must demonstrate a unique environmental injury — not just financial loss — to challenge governmental actions under SEQRA.
SMI, which operates the only landfill within Seneca Falls, argued that its operations would be adversely affected by the law’s enforcement. Yet the court determined that while property owners can sometimes challenge zoning laws affecting them directly, the same presumption of standing does not apply when the alleged harm is strictly economic. The company did not provide evidence of environmental damage resulting from the town’s actions.
The ruling marks a victory for local environmental groups and residents who have long advocated for closing the landfill, citing concerns about pollution and the quality of life in Seneca Falls. Dixie Lemmon and the Concerned Citizens of Seneca County, Inc., who were named respondents in the appeal, argued that SMI’s challenge was rooted in financial interest rather than genuine environmental concerns.
However, not all judges agreed with the decision. In a dissenting opinion, two judges argued that SMI, as the property owner directly affected by the law, should have been granted standing without the need to prove specific environmental harm. They cited previous cases where property owners were allowed to challenge zoning actions impacting their land.
The future of the Seneca Meadows landfill now hinges on the continued enforcement of Local Law No. 3. If upheld, the landfill, a significant regional waste repository, will cease operations at the end of 2025.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to [email protected].