Refresh

This website www.fingerlakes1.com/2024/12/18/watkins-glen-voters-reject-35-8m-capital-improvement-project-by-wide-margin/ is currently offline. Cloudflare's Always Online™ shows a snapshot of this web page from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. To check for the live version, click Refresh.

Skip to content
Home » News » Elections » Watkins Glen voters reject $35.8M capital improvement project by wide margin

Watkins Glen voters reject $35.8M capital improvement project by wide margin

  • / Updated:
  • Staff Report 

Voters in the Watkins Glen School District decisively rejected a proposed $35.8 million Capital Improvement Project on Tuesday, with 430 votes against and 174 in favor.

The plan, which aimed to upgrade facilities across the district’s schools, was designed to improve infrastructure, safety, and educational spaces. The defeat underscores significant community concerns about the scope and cost of the proposal.

“Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote,” Superintendent Kai D’Alleva said. “Community engagement is vital to our district’s decision-making process, and your input is greatly appreciated.”


D’Alleva acknowledged the outcome provides clear feedback for district officials. “While this outcome reflects community concerns, it also provides valuable insight as we continue to work together to address our district’s needs,” he said.

The plan outlined extensive renovations and improvements to the high school, elementary school, bus garage, and storage building. Upgrades included new LED stadium lights, improved ventilation systems, playground enhancements, and infrastructure repairs. Officials described the plan as addressing both modern educational needs and long-term maintenance.

Critics of the proposal, however, called it overly ambitious and expensive. During a Dec. 3 informational session, some residents expressed skepticism about the necessity of the upgrades. One voter described the project as “over-the-top spending,” while another questioned the proposed 4.08% tax hike that would remain in place for 17 years.


District officials said the project would have been 65% state-aided, with additional funds drawn from the district’s Capital Reserve. Nonetheless, concerns over immediate taxpayer burden and the overall cost appeared to sway voters.

Assistant Superintendent for Business Kyle Percey previously noted that the improvements were designed with long-term sustainability in mind. “This project addresses critical infrastructure needs and provides safer, more efficient learning environments,” Percey explained.

With the proposal’s rejection, the district’s Facilities Committee plans to regroup and reassess priorities. “We remain committed to finding solutions that align with the best interests of our students, staff, and community,” D’Alleva said.

The proposed upgrades included safety and accessibility enhancements such as door replacements, additional fire alarms, and ADA-compliant restrooms. At the high school, plans for athletic facilities upgrades, track resurfacing, and auditorium renovations were also part of the proposal.


Going forward, any new plan is likely to be scaled back. “Any proposal after this would be smaller,” D’Alleva said prior to the vote. The district spent a year developing the initial project, and officials stressed their belief in its importance, even as they acknowledged the democratic process.

The results signal that the district must balance necessary improvements with taxpayer willingness to fund them. Future proposals will likely focus on addressing the most pressing needs identified by the community.