Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has asked two federal watchdogs to examine the funding and production of Trump administration television ads that he says amount to partisan messaging paid for by taxpayers. The White House disputes that characterization, calling the spots public-service announcements.
The New York senator asked the Government Accountability Office and Office of Special Counsel to investigate and preserve records, according to an Oct. 6 release and letter from his office. He also said he plans to report President Donald Trump's alleged direction of the super PAC MAGA Inc. to pay for the ads to the Federal Election Commission. The release describes a planned complaint, not an FEC finding.
Schumer's letter says the ads carry a “Paid for by the U.S. Government” disclosure and use imagery and language he considers campaign-style advocacy ahead of the November midterm elections. He asked GAO to identify the agencies, accounts, contractors and officials involved, determine the full cost of production and placement, and assess whether the spending was authorized.
Agencies would examine different questions
Schumer asked the Office of Special Counsel to examine whether federal employees used official roles or resources for prohibited political activity. The office's Hatch Act guidance says most federal civilian executive-branch employees face restrictions on partisan activity while on duty or using government authority. The president and vice president are exempt from that law; a review of employees' actions would be a separate issue from whether the president himself violated it.
GAO has long distinguished unauthorized publicity or propaganda from legitimate government explanations of policy. Its published guidance and past decisions show that the content, purpose and funding authority of an advertisement matter. Schumer's assertion of an improper use of funds has not been established by a GAO decision on these ads.
In a Sept. 25 response, the White House said the announcements were not campaign ads because Trump is not on the ballot and the spots contain no call to action. It cited prior administrations' use of television public-service announcements. That response does not itself settle whether particular ads complied with appropriations or election law.
Super PAC allegation remains untested
Schumer's office said Trump had announced he would direct MAGA Inc. to pay for the ads. It argues that such direction would conflict with rules governing an independent-expenditure-only committee. The FEC describes independent expenditures as communications that expressly advocate a candidate's election or defeat and are not coordinated with a candidate or campaign. Whether the reported statement and the specific ads satisfy the legal tests is a question for the commission, not a finding in Schumer's announcement.
The release provides no completed audit, OSC determination or FEC ruling, and it does not identify a New York-specific contract or expenditure. The immediate development is Schumer's request for scrutiny of federally funded advertising and his announced intent to file a campaign-finance complaint.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to news@fingerlakes1.com.
