Budget concerns, infrastructure responsibilities, and intermunicipal service agreements dominated discussion at the Geneva City Council’s regular meeting Wednesday, with councilors and staff navigating a series of complex fiscal and policy issues as the 2026 budget process continues.
Here are the five key takeaways from the meeting:
1. City’s general fund faces pressure amid rising costs
City Manager Amie Hendrix and Comptroller Adam Blowers outlined continued concerns over the 2026 Recommended Budget, which includes a proposed 7.45% increase in General Fund expenditures and a drawdown of $835,764 from the General Fund balance. Several councilors questioned the sustainability of this approach.
Public commentary from Cyril Smith urged the council to limit appropriations, warning that the proposed drawdown would weaken the city’s fiscal standing and reduce flexibility for future leadership. “The 2026 RB could tie the hands of the new City leadership,” Smith wrote, recommending increased use of zero-based budgeting.
2. Water and sewer agreements under review
Officials discussed at length how the city charges surrounding towns for water and sewer services. The ongoing rate study drew attention, with Councilor Ken Lavin questioning why the Town of Seneca does not pay the city directly and how assessment-based billing by the Town of Geneva affects equity.
Comptroller Blowers confirmed that the city receives payments through existing intermunicipal agreements, and Assistant City Manager Anna Youngs noted the study will help determine if changes in rate structures are warranted. Council expressed interest in leveraging the data to potentially charge more to out-of-district users.
3. Sidewalk responsibility debate deferred until December
A temporary moratorium on sidewalk repair enforcement remains in place as the council continued to debate who should bear responsibility for sidewalk maintenance. Three options were presented by staff: maintaining the current homeowner-responsible policy, introducing a cost-sharing model, or shifting full responsibility to the city through capital budgeting.
While Assistant City Manager Youngs explained potential legal and financial implications, Mayor Steve Valentino advised against immediate action due to potential cost impacts, suggesting the next council revisit the ordinance. Councilors agreed to delay further action until December.
4. Police budget draws public concern over cuts, mental health needs
Anthony Noone, Chair of the Police Budget Advisory Board, delivered a detailed public comment criticizing cuts to the 2026 police budget, including reduced funding for equipment, training, and overtime. The board renewed its call for the city to restore two officer positions and fund a mental health co-response program.
“We are not here asking for excess. We are asking for a department that is functional, modern, and equipped to meet the demands of this city,” Noone said, advocating for investment in staffing, technology, and mental health response.
5. Fire truck replacement sparks budget and safety concerns
The proposed replacement of a frontline fire apparatus generated discussion over bonding, grant eligibility, and long-term cost. City officials noted the $1.2 million fire truck would not be delivered for at least three years due to manufacturing timelines.
Chief Parrotta emphasized the need for timely replacement due to rising costs and aging equipment. While some councilors questioned delaying the purchase, others noted that grant funding was still pending. The city will move forward with bidding, with bonding as a backup option if grants are not awarded.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to [email protected].