Refresh

This website www.fingerlakes1.com/2025/03/05/irs-workforce-faces-drastic-cuts-under-new-trump-plan/ is currently offline. Cloudflare's Always Online™ shows a snapshot of this web page from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. To check for the live version, click Refresh.

Skip to content
Home » News » Politics » IRS workforce faces drastic cuts under new Trump plan

IRS workforce faces drastic cuts under new Trump plan

  • / Updated:
  • Staff Report 

The Internal Revenue Service is preparing for one of the most significant workforce reductions in its history, with the Trump administration planning to slash up to 50% of the agency’s 90,000 employees, according to reports from the Associated Press and The New York Times. The move is part of a broader initiative led by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to dramatically reduce the size of the federal government through layoffs, buyouts, and attrition.

This sweeping downsizing raises serious concerns about the agency’s ability to effectively enforce tax laws, process returns, and combat tax evasion. Experts warn that the cuts could severely hinder revenue collection, delay taxpayer refunds, and disproportionately benefit high-income individuals and corporations that rely on complex tax strategies.


A Workforce on the Chopping Block

The IRS workforce has already seen major reductions in recent months, with:

  • 7,000 probationary employees laid off in February, primarily workers with less than a year of service.
  • An estimated 45,000 more jobs at risk, pending a White House review.
  • A “deferred resignation program” that encourages buyouts across federal agencies, including the IRS.

While the administration argues these cuts will improve efficiency, critics—including former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen—say they will render the agency dysfunctional at a time when it is still recovering from years of underfunding.

“Aggressive reductions in the IRS’s resources will only render our government less effective and less efficient in collecting the taxes Congress has imposed,” Koskinen and six other former IRS commissioners wrote in a New York Times op-ed.


The Cost of Cutting the IRS: More than Just Jobs

1. Delays in Tax Processing and Refunds

With fewer staff, taxpayers can expect:

  • Longer wait times for refunds—especially for paper filers.
  • Severe backlogs in audits, appeals, and collections.
  • Reduced assistance for taxpayers navigating tax laws.

2. A Blow to Tax Enforcement

The IRS has spent years rebuilding its enforcement capabilities, particularly in auditing wealthy individuals and corporations. The latest job cuts could reverse this progress.

  • The Large Business and International (LB&I) division, responsible for auditing companies with over $10 million in assets, has been particularly hard hit.
  • Highly specialized staff—engineers, forensic accountants, and tax law experts—are being let go, significantly reducing oversight over complex tax filings.
  • Research indicates that every $1 spent on tax enforcement returns between $5 and $12 in revenue, meaning IRS cuts could cost more than they save.

3. A Tax Break for the Wealthy?

With fewer IRS auditors and enforcement officers, high-net-worth individuals and corporations may face less scrutiny on complex tax avoidance schemes.

“When those audits stop because there isn’t anybody to do them, people will say, ‘Hey, I did that last year, I’ll do it again this year,’” Koskinen warned.

By contrast, middle-class taxpayers and small businesses—who typically rely on straightforward tax returns—will continue to bear a heavier share of the tax burden.


The Politics Behind the Cuts

The Trump administration’s broader strategy to shrink the federal workforce includes:

  • Eliminating entire federal agencies and shifting their responsibilities.
  • Moving IRS workers to immigration enforcement roles at the Department of Homeland Security.
  • Delegating more tax oversight responsibilities to private-sector contractors.

While the administration claims this approach reduces government waste, opponents argue it is a calculated effort to dismantle regulatory oversight.

“This is not about efficiency,” said former IRS engineer Vanessa Rollins. “This is about undermining the government’s ability to function.”


What’s Next?

The White House has given federal agencies until March 13 to submit workforce reduction plans. If the administration proceeds with the IRS cuts, they could take effect by the end of the 2025 tax season.

However, the impact will be long-lasting. Reduced enforcement means:

  • Less revenue collection, worsening federal deficits.
  • More tax avoidance, particularly among corporations and the wealthy.
  • Longer processing times, frustrating taxpayers who rely on IRS services.

As debates continue, lawmakers and policy experts are urging Congress to intervene and ensure that the IRS remains capable of fulfilling its essential role. Whether these cuts proceed as planned will be a defining issue in the coming months.