The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has prompted a surge in interest around how existing laws, particularly U.S. tort law, might address the risks associated with these systems. A new report highlights the challenges and uncertainties surrounding the application of tort law to AI, emphasizing the need for clarity in liability frameworks as advanced AI systems become increasingly integrated into daily life.
Key Challenges in AI-Related Tort Cases
Tort law, primarily a state-governed body of common law, provides a foundation for adjudicating harms caused by wrongful actions. Its adaptability makes it a likely framework for addressing AI-related harms, but several complexities arise:
- Negligence and Duty of Care: Plaintiffs might claim that AI developers or deployers failed to act with reasonable care, leading to harm. Courts may evaluate negligence based on industry standards and safety practices, which remain underdeveloped for AI technologies.
- Complex Supply Chains: Identifying liability becomes difficult when AI systems involve multiple actors, including developers, deployers, and end-users. Determining who bears responsibility for an injury might hinge on nuanced causation doctrines.
- Defining AI as a Product: Whether AI qualifies as a “product” under products liability law is unresolved. If deemed a product, courts could apply tests like the “consumer expectations” or “risk-utility” standards to assess claims of defectiveness.
- First Amendment Implications: AI-generated outputs resembling speech could invoke First Amendment protections, complicating tort claims, particularly in cases involving misinformation or defamation.
- Section 230 Protections: The applicability of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields online platforms from liability for third-party content, remains uncertain for AI-related harms.
The Role of Federal and State Courts
As tort law is primarily state-driven, liability rules for AI-caused harms could vary widely across jurisdictions. This state-by-state approach allows courts to adapt to local needs but risks creating inconsistent standards for developers and deployers. Some states may incorporate Restatements of Torts, influential guidelines summarizing common law principles, to shape their rulings.
Federal policymakers could intervene to establish uniform liability standards for AI, but such measures would need to balance the evolving nature of AI with the need for national consistency.
Path Forward
While tort law’s flexibility positions it to address novel issues posed by AI, gaps in standards and the technology’s complexity could make adjudicating such cases unpredictable. Policymakers and industry leaders are encouraged to develop clearer safety guidelines and frameworks, which could reduce legal uncertainties and improve AI governance.
The report emphasizes the importance of ongoing dialogue among stakeholders, including courts, legislators, and industry players, to ensure liability frameworks evolve alongside AI technologies. These efforts will be critical to balancing innovation with accountability as AI systems reshape society.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to [email protected].