Skip to content
DiSanto Propane (Banner)
Home » News » New York State » Debating Daylight Saving Time: Are you tired of springing forward and falling back?

Debating Daylight Saving Time: Are you tired of springing forward and falling back?

As daylight saving time approaches, prompting most of the U.S. to “spring forward,” discussions resurface about the merits and drawbacks of this biannual clock change. With daylight saving time set to begin, bringing later sunsets and shifts in our daily routines, some lawmakers are advocating for the end of clock adjustments, proposing either permanent standard time or permanent daylight saving time. This debate highlights differing opinions on how such a change could impact daily life, safety, and health.

The implications of ending the clock change are multifaceted, ranging from altered daylight hours to potential health benefits. For example, permanent daylight saving time could mean darker mornings but extended evening light, which has mixed consequences including safety concerns for morning commutes and benefits for those with seasonal affective disorder. Historical attempts at permanent daylight saving time have met resistance, notably due to the challenges of darker winter mornings.

Despite bipartisan support for ending the biannual clock change, legislative efforts have stalled, leaving the current practice in place. Health experts and lawmakers remain divided over which system would be best, with some citing the natural alignment of permanent standard time with human circadian rhythms as preferable for health, while others emphasize the societal and economic benefits of more afternoon daylight. As it stands, Americans will continue adjusting their clocks twice a year, awaiting any potential legislative changes that could standardize timekeeping across the nation.

Categories: New York StateNews