In a significant development in the ongoing legal case involving Steuben County Sheriff Jim Allard, a New York State Supreme Court Justice has granted permission to examine private conversations of county legislators. The review focuses on executive sessions held prior to the legislature’s decision to revoke legal protections for the sheriff’s position. The controversial vote, which took place on September 25, 2023, led to a 10-7 decision against indemnifying Sheriff Allard, sparking legal challenges and a temporary restraining order on the decision.
Karlee S. Bolanos, representing Sheriff Allard, argued for the right to depose Legislator Hilda Lando about discussions in these closed-door sessions. Justice Jason Cook’s ruling now opens the door to scrutinize what influenced legislators’ votes. Lando, however, has stated her intention to maintain confidentiality regarding executive session content, despite the legal order.
This case highlights tensions between transparency and confidentiality in government proceedings. Sheriff Allard contends that the public deserves to know the factors affecting the vote, suggesting potential misinformation or undue influence. The lawsuit seeks to establish whether the decision to remove indemnification, which protects the sheriff from personal liability in official duties, was made in good faith. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for legislative conduct and executive session disclosures.
FingerLakes1.com is the region’s leading all-digital news publication. The company was founded in 1998 and has been keeping residents informed for more than two decades. Have a lead? Send it to [email protected].